Saturday, December 16, 2017

David Lemieux vs. Billy Joe Saunders: quick prefight analysis and betting prediction



Fight: David Lemieux (38-3, 33 KOs) vs. Billy Joe Saunders (25-0, 12 KOs)
Location: Place Bell, Laval, Quebec, Canada
Date: December 16, 2017
Weight class: Middleweight (160 lbs)
Title(s) on the line: WBO World middleweight title
TV: HBO
Line: Lemieux -115, Saunders -105 (5 Dimes, 12/15/17)
Ring Magazine Rankings: Lemieux: #3 ranked middleweight, Saunders: #4 ranked middleweight
Style: Lemieux: Orthodox, Saunders: Southpaw
Referee: Michael Griffin


Why you should watch this fight


In a middleweight division loaded with talent, Billy Joe Saunders is an undefeated world title holder (WBO) who is arguably the third best middleweight on the planet behind boxing superstars Canelo Alvarez and Gennady Golovkin.

Saunders is a tough and very talented technician who has beaten everyone put in front of him,  including highly regarded World Boxing Super Series super middleweight favorite and - at the time undefeated - Chris Eubank Jr. But Saunders will be fighting outside the the friendly confines of his home country (the United Kingdom) for the first time in his professional career Saturday night when he travels to Canada to face one of the most dangerous power punchers in the sport in David Lemieux on Lemieux's home turf in Montreal. Lemieux is a highly aggressive, explosive puncher with power in both hands and an impressive 80.5% KO ratio over 41 professional fights; his only loss in the past seven years was to current Ring Magazine pound-for-pound #1-ranked fighter Golovkin.

A win for Lemieux tomorrow night would be by far the most impressive of his career (would in fact be his first win vs. a top-level opponent) and would firmly establish him as one of the top four or five middleweights in the world. The winner of this fight is probably the most likely to face the winner of next May's Canelo vs. Golovkin rematch later in 2018 for a middleweight unification bout that could result in the first undisputed middleweight champion in boxing since Jermain Taylor in 2006.

With the exception of a few, fighters from the United Kingdom have typically not fared well in title fights overseas in hostile environments vs. world-class opposition. A win for Saunders tomorrow night vs. Lemieux would actually be one of the more impressive wins for a UK fighter outside the UK in recent years. 


Prefight Analysis


As the odds suggest, Lemieux vs. Saunders is a true "50/50" fight that could go either way. Extremely difficult to predict the winner here.

What you have to like about Saunders is that he is likely the better pure boxer/technician in this matchup, with his high ring intelligence and superior boxing skills. Unlike Lemieux, Saunders has also never lost a fight in his professional career. Whenever Saunders has faced a tough, top-level opponent (vs. Eubank Jr., Andy Lee, or even his most recent fight vs. a solid Willie Monroe Jr. - all of whom are arguably on the same level as, if not even slightly better than Lemieux) he's emerged from the fight victorious. Lemieux, on the other hand, has never beaten a fighter near the caliber of Saunders and has actually already lost twice in his hometown of Montreal to fighters with less skill than Saunders. (Lemieux's first loss was to a fighter in Joachim Alcine who proceeded to lose his next five fights after beating Lemieux.)

Although Saunders doesn't have Lemieux's power, he strikes me as both mentally and physically tougher than Lemieux - a toughness I think that is the result of his blue collar, Gypsy upbringing where he'd been fighting in bare-knuckle competitions when he was only five years old. Saunders has a tight, effective defense (opponents land only 18% of total punches and 23.6% of power punches vs. Saunders) and has never been knocked out or knocked down in his professional career. (Lemieux, on the other hand, has been stopped twice.) I think Saunders' superior boxing skill (in particular his solid jab which I expect to be very effective in managing distance vs. Lemieux), as well as his oft-overlooked mental toughness and grit may be too much for Lemieux to over come - even in Montreal.

With all that said, I'm not at all comfortable betting on Saunders to win this fight - even at nearly even money odds - as Lemieux does have several advantages in this matchup. This fight is essentially in Lemieux's hometown (Laval, Quebec - a suburb of Montreal) and - although Saunders is technically the "A" side fighter in this matchup - Lemieux's promoter Golden Boy is the more high profile, lead promoter for Saturday night's boxing card. I strongly suspect the home crowd atmosphere combined with the backing of Golden Boy Promotions may create a scoring bias in favor of Lemieux - as it arguably did  this past May for Golden Boy-backed Canelo in his controversial draw vs. Golovkin, a fight which many felt he clearly lost. Again, this will be the first time in Saunders' professional career that he's fought outside of the United Kingdom, so it's tough to predict how well he'll fare fighting in a hostile environment.

Although Saunders may have slightly faster hand speed, Lemieux is the superior athlete with much greater punching power. Saunders has never in his career faced a fighter with Lemieux's combination of power and punch volume and could end up getting overwhelmed by Lemieux's effective aggression - especially in the later rounds where Saunders is known to gas out on occasion. And though Lemieux has lost earlier in his career - as an inexperienced 22-year old - to lesser opponents than Saunders, he's gained experience and improved a bit since those losses; since losing two consecutive fights in 2011, Lemieux has lost only one other fight - to a fighter in Golovkin many consider the best pound-for-pound fighter in the world and one of the great middleweights of all time. Saunders, on the other hand, hasn't looked particularly impressive in recent fights, causing some to speculate whether he's already past his peak as a top-level fighter.

Lemieux vs. Saunders is a "toss-up" fight in the truest sense of the word. Despite Lemieux's power advantage inside the ring and advantage in some key intangibles outside of the ring (home crowd, high-profile promoter), I still slightly favor Saunders' superior boxing skills, defense, and mental toughness to prevail vs. Lemieux. Just not enough to bet on it.

I do, however, believe Saunders - with his slick defensive abilities and solid chin (a chin which has never hit the canvas in his professional career) - is highly likely to get through the full 12 rounds with Lemieux, win or lose. Note that 2 of Lemieux's last 3 fights within the past 14 months - both vs. lesser-skilled opponents than Saunders - went the full distance with Lemieux failing to score even one knockdown in either fight. Note also that Lemieux - who, like Saunders, has a history of stamina issues - has only one of his 33 TKO/KO victories past the 7th round; in other words, if Lemieux doesn't stop his opponent in the early or middle rounds, he's usually not stopping them late.

With Saunders not being much of a puncher himself (only two wins by TKO/KO in the past five years and a career TKO/KO% of only 48%), I think that the best value on this fight is to bet that the fight goes the full 12 rounds - a bet that is currently available at around -150 odds.

As far as the outcome, it's hard to predict even what kind of fight will break out Saturday night. A high-volume war likely favors Lemieux, while a slower-paced, more tactical fight likely favors Saunders. Bur either way it's an intriguing matchup and tough test that puts a lot at stake for both fighters.


Prediction: Saunders by decision

Recommended bet: Lemieux/Saunders goes full 12 rounds (.5 unit)


  for additional boxing analysis and to be notified of new blog updates!!!

Friday, December 8, 2017

Lomachenko vs. Rigondeaux: prefight analysis and betting prediction



Fight: Vasyl Lomachenko (9-1, 7 KOs) vs. Guillermo Rigondeaux (17-0, 11 KOs)
Location: The Theater at Madison Square Garden, New York City, New York
Date: December 9, 2017
Weight class: Super featherweight (130 lbs)
Title(s) on the line:  WBO World super featherweight title
TV: ESPN
Line: Lomachenko: -325, Rigondeaux: +295 (5 Dimes, 12/8/17)
Purses: Lomachenko: $1.2 million, Rigondeaux: $400,000
Ring Magazine Rankings: Lomachenko: #3 ranked pound-for-pound/#1 ranked junior lightweight, Rigondeaux: #4 ranked pound-for-pound/#1 ranked junior featherweight
Style: Lomachenko: Southpaw, Rigondeaux: Southpaw
Referee: Steve Willis


Why you should watch this fight


For hardcore boxing fans, Vasyl Lomachenko vs. Guillermo Rigondeaux is right up there with Canelo vs. Golovkin and the first Andre Ward vs. Sergey Kovalev matchup as one of the most anticipated fights in recent years between two pound-for-pound ranked fighters in their prime.

The aforementioned Canelo/Golovkin and Ward/Kovalev matchups were PPV-televised fights. At least in the United States. boxing fans with a basic cable subscription will be able to watch tomorrow's highly anticipated matchup for free on ESPN.

Saturday's matchup features arguably the two greatest fighters in the 120+ year history of organized amateur boxing and will be the first time in the history of the sport fighters who have each won multiple Olympic gold medals will have faced each other. As an amateur, Lomachenko had a boxing record of 396-1 and won Olympic gold representing the Ukraine in the 2008 (Beijing) and 2012 (London) Olympics, while Rigondeaux boasted an amateur boxing record of 463-12 and won Olympic gold representing Cuba in the 2000 (Sydney) and 2004 (Athens) Olympics.

Lomachenko - who first won a major world title 3.5 years ago in only his third professional fight - is widely regarded as a historically great talent with first ballot hall-of-fame potential and is considered by many to be the fighter most likely to end up being the greatest boxer of the post-Mayweather era (assuming Mayweather is retired for good this time). On Saturday, Lomachenko will be facing by far the toughest test in young professional career in Rigondeaux - an experienced master technician who has never even come close to losing a fight in his professional career and who some would argue is even more skilled than even the uber-talented Lomachenko.

This fight between two top five pound-for-pound talents (Ring Magazine ranks Lomachenko and Rigondeaux as the #3 and #4 boxers in the world, respectively) should go a very long way to answering whether Lomachenko is truly deserving of the massive hype he's received as a potential all-time great and possible best boxer of a post-Mayweather/Pacquiao generation. On the other hand this fight also has the potential of being a career-defining win for Rigondeaux, a vastly underappreciated talent who has long been one of the best boxers in the sport pound-for-pound (if not the best), but has been sharply criticized for his elusive, fan-unfriendly boxing style, weak level of opposition, and general inactivity. (Rigondeaux has fought only four times in the past three years and fought only three full rounds in the past two years.) If a 37-year old Rigondeaux - who has fought his entire professional career at super bantamweight (122 lbs) - can jump up two weight classes and put on an impressive performance at super featherweight (130 lbs) vs. a fighter in Lomachenko whom many have pegged as a future hall-of-famer after only ten professional fights, it should go a long way towards silencing his numerous doubters and solidifying his own claim as one of the best boxers of this generation.



Why Vasyl Lomachenko will win


After only ten professional fights, Lomachenko is considered by many boxing fans and experts alike to be arguably the best boxer in the sport pound-for-pound (Ring Magazine currently has him ranked #3 pound-for-pound, while ESPN has him ranked #2) and a fighter who may potentially go down as one of the greatest boxers the sport has ever seen.

Lomachenko - the current WBO super featherweight champion of the world - has perhaps the most impressive record in the history of amateur boxing (career amateur boxing record of 396-1 record, double Olympic gold medalist, two-time amateur boxing world champion). He was also able to win a major world title in only his third professional fight and became a two-division world champion (at featherweight and super featherweight) in only his seventh professional fight, both records for the fewest fights at the start of a professional career to achieve these feats.

Lomachenko's hype and impressive achievements are the result of what appears to be freakish, historically great talent and skill. Lomachenko is a master technician with exceptional footwork and impeccable timing. His deft footwork in particular appears to be the root of his greatness, allowing him to throw precise punches from unorthodox, unpredictable angles with power as well as dominate the tempo of fights by controlling distance with his movement. He is a highly intelligent pressure fighter who throws punches at a high volume with very good hand speed and great accuracy.

Given Lomachenko's high volume, pressure-oriented style, one should expect him to be more active and consistently throw more punches than the relatively low-volume, defensive-minded Rigondeaux - who will primarily be looking to counter Lomachenko's offensive attack.

Since his split decision loss 3.5 years ago to Orlando Salido (a fight that was only the 2nd fight of Lomachenko's professional career in which Salido failed to make weight and came in to the fight 21 pounds over the 126 lb weight limit), Lomachenko has won eight straight fights - with the last six by TKO/KO in dominating fashion. Still very early in his professional career, Lomachenko appears to be improving with each fight, with performances so dominant in recent fights that his last three opponents - including highly regarded and then-undefeated Nicholas Walters - voluntarily quit on their stools during the middle rounds of their fights.

As a 130 lb super featherweight world title holder who won Olympic gold and was a world champion as an amateur at lightweight (135 lbs), Lomachenko will likely enter Saturday's matchup with a noticeable weight advantage vs. the physically smaller Rigondeaux - who is moving two weight classes up from super bantamweight (122 lbs) to fight at 130 lbs for the first time in his boxing career, professional or amateur. Lomachenko's experience at the higher weight class combined with his versatile set of skills and superior athleticism may prove to be overwhelming vs. even an unquestionably elite pound-for-pound fighter in Rigondeaux. Rigondeaux is a defensively-gifted counterpuncher with very underrated power but one has to wonder how well that power will carry up two weight classes for a past-prime, 37-year old fighter who has been relatively inactive in recent years. (Rigondeaux has fought only three full rounds the past three years and fought only once in each of the past three years.)

Lomachenko's lone loss was to a pressure fighter in Salido who used high punch volume, a significant weight advantage, and experience to essentially bully a relatively inexperienced Lomachenko in the early rounds of their fight en route to a controversial split decision victory. Rigondeaux is a much smaller, low-volume counter puncher who doesn't have the pressure style that Salido used over 3 years ago to defeat a now much more experienced Lomachenko.

Lomachenko's pressuring style leaves him susceptible to counter punching at times but his excellent footwork, as well as frequent and varied upper body and punch feints makes him very difficult to time and hit cleanly. One shouldn't be surprised if even Rigondeaux's highly accurate counter punching and superior hand speed have trouble finding the target vs. Lomachenko's crafty defense. Even if Rigondeaux is able to land punches, one has to wonder how effective the punching power of a career super bantamweight will be vs. a bigger fighter who has never been knocked down in his professional career and has only been knocked down once in 397 amateur fights. Rigondeaux, on the other hand, has been knocked down four times across three fights at 122 lbs vs. smaller fighters with less power than Lomachenko.

At Madison Square Garden in New York City Lomachenko and his engaging, crowd-pleasing style will be the clear fan favorite vs. Rigondeaux and his low-volume, defensively-oriented tactics, which have been criticized by numerous boxing observers as "boring." Note that the pro-Lomachenko crowd and Lomachenko's fan-friendly ring style - complete with aggressive, accurate, and clean power punching that judges tend to favor - stand a good chance of creating a scoring bias in favor of Lomachenko if the fight is close and competitive. (In other words, I think it will be difficult for Rigondeaux to win this fight on the judges' scorecards unless he completely dominates Lomachenko.)

Lomachenko is younger (by 8 years) than the 37-year old Rigondeaux and is the more ambitious fighter - as evidenced by his willingness to take on elite fighters like Rigondeaux so early in his professional career; every fight he's fought since his first professional fight has been a major world title fight vs. a solid opponent. Rigondeaux comes into Saturday's matchup as an underappreciated 3-1 underdog who feels he has a lot to prove but I think Lomachenko is the more determined, ambitious fighter fighting to establish a legacy that will perhaps render him one of the great fighters of this (or any) generation; an impressive performance vs. Rigondeaux would go a long way towards building that legacy. 


Why Guillermo Rigondeaux will win


Like Lomachenko, Rigondeaux is widely considered one of the best boxers in the sport pound-for-pound (Ring Magazine has him ranked #4, while ESPN has him at #7). Also like Lomachenko, Rigondeaux has an impressive amateur boxing pedigree that includes two Olympic gold medals and multiple international amateur championships. In his professional career, Rigondeaux is undefeated (17-0) and is the current WBA super bantamweight champion of the world.

Rigondeaux arguably hasn't even come close to losing a fight since turning pro in 2009 and he hasn't lost a fight as an amateur or pro since 2003.

As excellent and highly regarded as Lomachenko is, many actually consider Rigondeaux to be the superior boxer overall. Hall-of-fame trainer Freddie Roach, who trained Rigondeaux early in his career, noted that Rigondeaux was "the best counter puncher" and "probably the greatest talent" he'd ever seen. Indeed, Rigondeaux is universally regarded as a master counter puncher with superior hand speed and punching power to that of Lomachenko's (though it remains to be seen how well Rigondeaux's very underrated power carries up two weight classes to super featherweight). Rigondeaux's counter punching is particularly effective to the body, where he's been able to land his powerful straight left with regularity vs. most opponents. Regardless of size advantage - if Rigondeaux can land even some of those body shots vs. Lomachenko, it will likely go a long way towards wearing Lomachenko down by the latter rounds of the fight.

While Lomachenko is the bigger guy who will come into the ring with a size and weight advantage Saturday night, it remains to be seen how effective Lomachenko will actually be in imposing his size on Rigondeaux. While he's certainly a skilled pressure fighter, Lomachenko has never been known as a particularly physical fighter - he's always relied much more on crafty movement, speed, and accuracy than physically imposing himself on his opponent with size and brute strength. So how valuable will Lomachenko's size advantage really be in this matchup?

Well-schooled in the highly-respected Cuban amateur boxing system, Rigondeaux is an extremely efficient, accurate counter puncher who might have the best defense in the entire sport with his excellent footwork and vertical/lateral elusiveness. Rigondeaux's 2.5-inch reach advantage over Lomachenko should enhance Rigondeaux's ability to counter punch from distance and elude Lomachenko's pressure.

One should also expect Rigondeaux's rare combination of hand speed, punching power (in both hands), and accuracy to at least somewhat stymie Lomachenko's attack. Rigondeaux has a history of freezing even highly-regarded opponents with precise counter punching. Remember that in 2013, Rigondeaux entered his fight with then-WBO super bantamweight champion Nonito Donaire - who had not lost a fight in over 12 years and was considered by most to be one of the top five boxers in the sport pound-for-for-pound at the time - as a 2-1 underdog. In that fight Rigondeaux put up probably the best performance of his professional career, ending Donaire's 30-fight win streak by outclassing him with timely counter punching and speed - dominating the fight despite Donaire's advantages in size and power. In his fight immediately following the Donaire fight, Rigondeaux similarly stymied former two-time IBF bantamweight champion Joseph Agbeko - a fight in which a normally tough and high-volume Agbeko landed only 48 punches over the course of 12 rounds (the second fewest punches landed over 12 rounds in the 32-year history of CompuBox-tracked fights).

Rigondeaux's relative inactivity in recent years (he's fought only four times over the past three years) may actually work as an advantage; given his lack of ring activity and cautious, defensively-oriented style, Rigondeaux has suffered very little wear-and-tear over the course of his 18-fight professional career. For a 37-year old fighter past his athletic prime, he is relatively fresh and has shown zero signs of slippage in speed or power in any of his recent fights.

Despite having fought only 18 career fights as a pro, Rigondeaux also has a slight advantage in professional boxing experience over Lomachenko, who is fighting in his 11th fight as only a 4th-year pro. A large part of the reason Lomachenko lost to a less-skilled Salido in 2014 was Salido's significant advantage in experience. Lomachenko has gained experience and has become a better fighter in the 3.5 years since that loss but Rigondeaux is infinitely more skilled than Salido and will be by far the toughest, most skilled opponent Lomachenko has fought (and likely will fight, regardless of who he faces in the future) in his career.   

This is the biggest fight of Rigondeaux's career. Coming into this fight as a significant underdog vs. a heavily glorified opponent and having taken a lot of criticism throughout his career for his inactivity and risk-averse style, Rigondeaux has a lot to prove. In the previous biggest fight of his career (vs. Donaire), Rigondeaux put up a technical masterpiece vs. a bigger, stronger opponent in what was probably the most brilliant performance of his career. He will surely be (highly) motivated to do the same Saturday night vs. Lomachenko.


Prefight Analysis


Given the elite pedigree and skills - as well as solid punching power - of both boxers, this is a fight that could end a number of possible different ways.

Despite being a significant underdog, Rigondeaux is the more experienced, quicker, and arguably the better overall skilled fighter (particularly from a defensive standpoint) in this matchup. Though he's the smaller fighter, he may also actually be the more dangerous puncher (at least in terms of one-punch knockout power). Unlike Lomachenko, Rigondeaux has never lost a fight in his professional carer (and has never really even come close to losing a fight) and has a history of making even well-respected, top-level opponents look mediocre (see his fights vs. former world champions Donaire and Agbeko).

There should be no surprise whatsoever if Rigondeaux is able to use elusive footwork, as well as his superior hand speed and counter punching abilities to outbox - perhaps even outclass - an immensely gifted but slightly slower and relatively inexperienced Lomachenko. And although it would be surprising, it wouldn't be a tremendous shocker to see Rigondeaux - whose punching power is often overlooked given his low-volume, defensively-oriented style - land enough clean power punches in countering Lomachenko's pressure to stop him in the late rounds. Assuming Rigondeaux's power holds up well at the higher weight class and assuming he hasn't lost much speed or power past his physical prime at 37-years old, taking Rigondeaux to win the fight at approximately +300 odds might be a decent value play.

But, at the end of the day, I see the two-weight class (8 lb) jump and size disparity to be a bit much for even a great defensive counter puncher like Rigondeaux to overcome. I see Rigondeaux facing similar challenges to the difficulties Kell Brook and Amir Khan had last year jumping up two weight classes (from welterweight to middleweight) to fight Gennady Golovkin and Canelo Alvarez. Both Brook and Khan were arguably more skilled than their bigger, pound-for-pound rated opponents and both even had success in the very early rounds, but the size advantage and power of Golovkin and Canelo proved to be overwhelming en route to brutal stoppage losses for both in the middle rounds. (And, after well over a year, neither Brook or Khan has fought again since being stopped.)

Rigondeaux is certainly more defensively skilled than Brook or Khan, and Lomachenko certainly does not have the power or the imposing size of a Golovkin or Canelo, but he has elite skill and precision - particularly shooting punches from unorthodox angles - to complement the respectable power he has. And Rigondeaux has shown a questionable chin even at the lower weight class vs. opponents with less punching power, having been knocked down four times in three of his previous fights.

Rigondeaux has a history of stymieing bigger, more aggressive opponents but at this higher weight class I think Lomachenko's size, pressure, and craftiness will be too much for even a defensively gifted Rigondeaux to handle - especially given Rigondeaux's lack of punch volume.

I don't see Rigondeaux's power carrying  up to 130 lbs as well as some might expect - especially vs. a fighter like Lomachenko who has shown a very good chin (having never come close to being knocked down in his brief professional career and being knocked down only once in a 397-fight amateur career) and is much more difficult to hit cleanly than previous top-level Rigondeaux opponents like Donaire and Agbeko with his excellent footwork and frequent body feints.

Also consider that if the fight ends up being close I'd expect the more entertaining, higher volume Lomachenko to get the nod on the judges' scorecards over a relatively low-volume, defensive-minded Rigondeaux - especially in front of what will be a decidedly pro-Lomachenko crowd on a boxing card backed by Lomachenko's promoter, Top Rank. (In other words yes, I expect boxing politics to favor Lomachenko over the relatively unpopular Rigondeaux if the fight happens to be close.)

I think there is a pretty good chance Lomachenko overwhelms Rigondeaux and stops him in the later rounds but, given Rigondeaux's defensive prowess, I think it's more likely Rigondeaux is able to survive the full 12 rounds. Given the high IQ and crazy skills of both fighters I see this fight having more moments resembling a high-level chess match - where not many punches are landed - than of a bloody brawl. But whether it's by stoppage or by decision I think most signs point to a Lomachenko victory here, so would go with Lomachenko simply to win (currently at -325 odds) as your best bet. 

I'll be at this fight Saturday night; if the matchup in the ring is even half as good as the matchup on paper, we're in for a classic given the impressive pedigree and skill of both fighters!


Prediction: Lomachenko to win

Recommended bet: Lomachenko to win (1 unit)




  for additional boxing analysis and to be notified of new blog updates!!!

Saturday, September 16, 2017

Canelo vs. Golovkin: prefight analysis and betting prediction



Fight: Saul "Canelo" Alvarez (49-1-1 34 KOs) vs. Gennady Golovkin (37-0, 33 KOs)
Location: T-Mobile Arena, Las Vegas, Nevada
Date: September 16, 2017
Weight class: Middleweight (160 lbs)
Title(s) on the line:  WBC World middleweight, WBA Super World middleweight, and IBF World middleweight titles (Canelo has opted not to accept the WBC belt if he wins so that title will become vacant if Canelo wins the fight.)
TV: HBO PPV
Line: Alvarez: +140, Golvkin: -150 (5 Dimes, 9/16/17)
Purse: Alvarez: $5 million, Golovkin: $3 million  (guaranteed money only - both fighters stand to make substantially more based on their share of PPV revenues, ticket sales, etc.)
Ring Magazine Rankings: Alvarez: #8 ranked pound-for-pound/Ring Magazine middleweight champion, Golovkin: #2 ranked pound-for-pound/#1 ranked middleweight
Style: Alvarez: Orthodox, Golovkin: Orthodox
Referee: Kenny Bayless


Why you should watch this fight


Thus far, 2017 has been an outstanding year for boxing featuring quite a few thrilling fights and long-awaited matchups between high-profile boxers. But tonight's fight between Canelo Alvarez and Gennady Golovkin is probably the most long-awaited, highly anticipated matchup of them all. Tonight will be a matchup between two of the biggest names in boxing - both of whom are ranked in Ring Magazine pound-for-pound top 10 and are arguably the two best middleweights in the sport.

With Floyd Mayweather's retirement, Canelo is unquestionably the top PPV attraction in boxing right now - he's a wildly popular boxer (particularly in his home country of Mexico, where he attracts Superbowl-like ratings every time he fights) in the prime of his career with elite skills to match his popularity. The only loss on Canelo's record is to undefeated pound-for-pound legend Mayweather, but Canelo seems to have noticeably improved after each fight since that loss with seven consecutive wins, six of which came against current or former world champions.

But, including the Mayweather fight, Canelo is now faced with what may be the toughest fight of his career in Golovkin. Gennady Golovkin, the #2 pound-for-pound ranked boxer in the world by Ring Magazine, is the undefeated WBA, WBC, and IBF middleweight champion of the world and has won 33 out of his 37 professional fights - including 23 out of his last 24 fights - by stoppage for a KO% of 89%, the highest KO% in middleweight boxing history. Golovkin looked vulnerable in his last fight - a closely-contested unanimous decision victory vs. Danny Jacobs last March (a fight which many felt he lost) - but Golovkin is still considered the most feared man in boxing. With the exception of his most recent fight vs. Jacobs, every fight scheduled for longer than 8 rounds in Golovkin's professional career (10 or 12 rounds) has ended in stoppage. Tonight will actually be Golovkin's first ever fight as a pro in Las Vegas.

On the heels of the much-hyped, entertaining, but (arguably) farcical Mayweather vs. McGregor boxing exhibition a few weeks ago, Canelo vs. Golovkin is what many would consider to be the real fight hardcore and casual boxing fans alike have been waiting for all year. Both Canelo and Golovkin are aggressive, stalking power punchers who prefer to fight from close range so this fight is virtually guaranteed to be an action-packed, intense matchup that likely won't last the full 12 rounds.

The winner of this fight will have earned by far the most significant win of their career (a win that will likely be the signature win of their career years from now upon retirement) and will have legitimate claim to be considered the #1 boxer in the sport pound-for-pound. The winner of this fight will also be the holder of at least two major middleweight title belts (Canelo has refused to accept the WBC middleweight title if he wins on Saturday night due to the WBC essentially forcing him to vacate middleweight title last year after failed negotiations with Golovkin, the mandatory challenger for the WBC title at the time) which sets up a possible unification megafight next year with undefeated WBO middleweight champion Billy Joe Saunders.

Already noted as one of the better middleweights in boxing history, Golovkin could retire tomorrow and likely be a boxing Hall of Fame inductee. Canelo perhaps isn't quite Hall-of-Fame level yet but a win over Golovkin Saturday night would make him an instant Mexican boxing legend (if he isn't already) and secure his status as a future Hall of Famer.

Why Canelo Alvarez will win


Canelo comes into this fight as a slight (+140) underdog but - like Golovkin - is widely considered one of the best boxers in the sport pound-for-pound. Canelo is ranked the #8 boxer in the world pound-for-pound by Ring Magazine and has been considered by the publication to be the true middleweight champion of the world since November 2015, when he beat Miguel Cotto by unanimous decision. Canelo doesn't currently hold any major world titles, but has previously held major titles in two weight divisions (light middleweight and middleweight), including being a former unified light middleweight champion  as well as being the lineal and WBC middleweight champion in recent years before (voluntarily) vacating the titles.

Canelo is a patient, but accurate and highly efficient puncher who has developed into arguably the best aggressive counterpuncher in the sport. Canelo is a technically savvy, A-level boxer with very good to great power in both hands. He throws multi-punch combinations as well as anyone in the sport (especially in terms of variation combined with power, accuracy, and deceptive hand speed) and is an excellent, committed body puncher. (Canelo's best punches are his left hook to the body and right uppercut, which have resulted in multiple TKO/KO victories in his most recent fights.)

Canelo is considered by most observers (including myself) to be the better pure boxer in this matchup. He is the higher IQ boxer, has advantages in hand and foot speed, and is the fighter more adept at making adjustments over the course of the fight. Canelo has only fought above 155 lbs twice in his career but has bulked up (in terms of muscle mass) significantly and will likely come into this fight with a size advantage vs. Golovkin, who has fought his entire professional career at or around 160 lbs.

In previous fights, Canelo has primarily had issues with slick fighters who move well and box mostly from distance (see his loss to Mayweather and his close, competitive fights vs. Erislandy Lara and Austin Trout). He certainly won't be up against this style of opponent on Saturday; a stalking pressure fighter who will be right in front of him the entire night. Canelo has superior inside fighting skills to Golovkin, and - in multiple recent fights - has shown that he is highly adept at counter punching effectively under pressure from close range with accurate, clean power punches. One should not be at all surprised if Canelo, unlike any previous Golovkin opponent, is able to outbox Golovkin on the inside with his back against the ropes - especially given that Golovkin's come-forward, pressuring style does provide ample clean counter punching opportunities.  I expect Canelo's superior hand speed and accurate power to be effective in spots here - even against a fighter with a seemingly impenetrable chin in Golovkin.

Although no defensive wizard, Canelo is also perhaps the more defensively skilled fighter compared to Golovkin. Canelo's upper body defensive movement in particular has noticeably improved in recent years, which should serve him well defending from close range vs. Golovkin. Canelo has also shown a solid chin over the course of his career; he's never been stopped or even knocked down in any of his fights as a pro. While not bad defensively, Golovkin's defense often times is mostly his offense; in executing his pressure attack he at times gets careless in terms of leaving his hands down and leaving himself open to clean counter punching after throwing punches. Canelo almost certainly will have some success exploiting Golovkin's defensive flaws.

Canelo is still a relatively young fighter still in the prime of his career and has shown noticeable improvement in most of his fights since his first Las Vegas fight several years ago vs. Miguel Cotto's brother Jose Cotto (a fight where he was badly hurt in the 1st round). By contrast, Golovkin is 35 years old (over 8 years older than Canelo), is past his prime, and arguably showed signs of regression in his most recent fight last March vs. Jacobs - his first fight in 24 fights (spanning the course of nearly a decade) where he failed to win by stoppage. (The Jacobs fight was also a fight many felt Golovkin lost outright.)

Despite his youth, Canelo has - at just 27 years of age - amassed one of the more impressive resumes in boxing, having fought (and beaten) elite and/or high profile former world champions such as Amir Khan, Miguel Cotto, Erislandy Lara, Shane Mosley, and Austin Trout. (This is in addition to fighting undefeated and pound-for-pound #1 Floyd Mayweather when he was only 23 years old.) In terms of elite opponents, Canelo's experience is decisively superior to that of Golovkin, who has fought tougher, pound-for-pound level opponents in his most recent fights vs. Jacobs and (an undersized) Kell Brook, but prior to that had fought at best fringe world champions that no one would've even considered ranking in the top 50 pound-for-pound.

Saturday's fight, the most anticipated matchup of the year between two championship-level boxers, will take place on Mexican Independence Day weekend in a sold out T-Mobile Arena in Las Vegas in front of a largely Mexican-American and Mexican crowd that will be overwhelmingly pro-Canelo - which could influence the fight inside the ring as well as the judges' scoring outside the ring. Judges' scorecards in Canelo fights have tended to strongly favor Canelo - even in fights considered close by the general public. (See the scoring in Canelo's recent competitive fights vs. Cotto, Lara, and Austin Trout as examples.) Even in Canelo's lone career loss to Mayweather (a fight where Mayweather arguably won up to 9 or 10 rounds), one judge scored the fight a draw; so if this fight ends up being close and competitive it's more likely than not (based on previous history) that the fight will be scored in favor of Canelo. (Though low volume at times, Canelo does have a fan-friendly style complete with accurate and very clean power punching that judges often tend to favor.)

Canelo is a highly determined, poised fighter who has always been very mature for his age. He and his trainers (trainers who have made training Canelo their primary focus since he turned pro at 15 years old) will certainly be extremely well prepared for Saturday's fight, win or lose. Canelo comes across as a fighter who, aside from for his family, fights primarily for his legacy and comes across as a man who just wants (to win) this more than Golovkin. In Golovkin's last fight, Jacobs also struck me as the fighter who was more determined and wanted it more - which I think is a large part of the reason that fight was close and competitive. Canelo - a more efficient and accurate puncher than Jacobs (and arguably a better overall boxer - maybe the best boxer Golovkin has faced in his career) - just may have better results given his seemingly similar advantage in determination.


Why Gennady Golovkin will win


Gennady Golovkin is the reigning WBA (Super), WBC, IBF, and middleweight champion and Ring Magazine pound-for-pound #2 boxer in the world (behind only fellow undefeated boxer Andre Ward). Golovkin is undefeated at 37-0 and, with 33 KOs in 37 fights, holds the highest knockout percentage (89%) in middleweight boxing history. Golovkin has reigned as middleweight champion for over seven years and has won 23 out of his last 24 fights by TKO/KO. Golovkin is one of the better middleweight boxers in the history of the division, having successfully defended his middleweight title(s) 18 consecutive times - two wins shy of tying Bernard Hopkins' record of 20 consecutive middleweight title defenses. While Golovkin has spent his entire professional career at or around 160 lbs, Canelo is fighting only the second fight of his career above 155 lbs.

Golovkin's experience extends back to his highly impressive amateur career, which includes a reported 345-5 record and a silver medal at the middleweight division in the 2004 Olympics in Athens, Greece.

Golovkin is the most feared boxer in the sport (and has been among the most avoided boxers for a large portion of his career) for good reasons. He's an outstanding pressure fighter with excellent punching power in both hands - power generated in large part from the balance he maintains at seemingly all times (hence his 89% TKO/KO rate). Golovkin's arguably historically great power is complimented by technical savvy and underrated boxing skills - he is far from just a great power puncher. Golovkin is very accurate with superb timing on his punches and has one of the better jabs in the sport - a punch which was highly effective in his TKO two years ago vs. David Lemieux and will likely be a key weapon in his arsenal tonight vs. Canelo. (Like Wladimir Klitschko, Golovkin's jab essentially works as another power punch, with which he is also able to effectively control distance.)   

Golovkin's immense power combined with his ability to cutoff the ring effectively are perhaps the biggest detriments to Canelo's chances of winning this fight. Unlike Jacobs, who was able to have success vs. Golovkin largely due to effective foot movement and the ability to box while backing up, Canelo is relatively flat-footed and likely will not be able to evade Golovkin's pressure. Canelo is adept at avoiding punches from close distance with savvy upper body movement and a tight guard but - due to his lack of consistent foot movement - he will be within range of Golovkin's power punching for significant stretches of the fight; it's highly unlikely he will be able to elude Golovkin's accurate (and often overwhelming) power punches for a full 12 rounds. Golovkin will land clean power punches... the key question here is how well Canelo - who has never fought anyone possessing anything close to Golovkin's punching power before - takes those punches while executing his own counterpunching attack. While Canelo may come in to the fight a bit bigger than Golovkin in terms of weight, Golovkin is physically stronger and (perhaps by a much wider margin than people think) has the superior punching power. Canelo's defense is above average and has improved greatly over the course of his career, but he is limited (especially in terms of speed and his lack of foot movement) and almost certainly will (eventually) get caught with flush punching from Golovkin.

Canelo is an aggressive counterpuncher but Golovkin is - both by nature and by design - the more aggressive, relentless fighter; it is highly likely that he will both thrown and land more punches that the relatively patient, low-output Canelo. Canelo is further hampered in this regard with his noted stamina issues; he is notorious for often taking stretches of rounds off  (e.g., retreating to the corner of the ring, decreasing his punch output) to preserve energy. This is something he was able to get away with vs. smaller fighters with less punching power but likely won't be able to at middleweight vs. a stalking pressure fighter like Golovkin who perhaps has the most effective punching power in the sport. Note that even a smaller Floyd Mayweather - notorious for his cautious, defensive style and known to have hand issues that mitigate his punching power - was able to be the aggressor and effectively walk Canelo down in numerous spots during their fight; Golovkin is not as skilled as Mayweather but it's difficult to imagine a substantially bigger, more aggressive fighter with superior punching power like Golovkin being less successful in pressuring Canelo than Mayweather.  

On the opposite side of the attack, Golovkin has faced - and beaten - bigger fighters and better punchers than Canelo; both Lemieux and Jacobs have greater punching power than Canelo at middleweight and Golovkin appeared to handle their power with ease. In addition to his incredible offensive attack, Golovkin has arguably the best chin in boxing - having never been stopped or even knocked down once in over 385(!) fights as an amateur or pro. Despite winning every round convincingly, Canelo did not come close to stopping the larger Julio Cesar Chavez Jr.; it's tough to imagine he'll come close to stopping a fighter in Golovkin who will likely display superior defense and perform much more effectively overall than Chavez did. 

There are doubts about how good Canelo really is - do his skills really match his hype and popularity? Canelo arguably lost highly competitive decision victories vs. Lara (one judge scored the fight for Lara), Austin Trout, and even Cotto - where many (including myself) felt the scorecards should've been much closer. There is a feeling by many that Canelo is overrated and that he isn't even the best fighter Golovkin has fought in his career; when Jacobs fought Golovkin last March he (like Canelo) was also a one-loss fighter who perhaps matches up better with Golovkin than Canelo ever could due to his superior punching power, naturally bigger body frame, and ability to box effectively on his feet. Jacobs is an underrated boxer whose skills arguably match - and overall perhaps are even superior - to those of Canelo.

Canelo is a highly talented boxer with the power and counter punching skills to be highly effective vs. Golovkin but moving up - not only in weight from the 147-155 lb fighters he's used to fighting - but in levels from Chavez in his last fight to one of the best middleweight fighters of this generation in Golovkin may be a case of Canelo biting off more than he can chew.


Prefight Analysis


I do think Canelo is a live underdog in this fight, to the extent that I'd actually consider grading him as a favorite if I knew with certainty that he'd be able to handle Golovkin's power at least as well as Jacobs did last March. Canelo, who is in the prime of his career and seems to have improved with each fight, is the younger, better skilled boxer and has the elite counter punching ability inside to potentially outbox a pressuring Golovkin from close distance. Golovkin has proven that he has a fantastic chin, but he is relatively untested to the body; if Canelo can have success landing body shots inside that may be effective in mitigating Golovkin's attack. Canelo is the more accurate puncher with quicker hands than Golovkin; I fully expect that he will be able to compete in stretches with Golovkin in the early rounds, particularly on the inside. If Canelo - who has never been stopped or knocked down in a fight - can withstand Golovkin's pressure and last the full twelve rounds, history indicates that he could very well be given the benefit of the doubt on the judges' scorecards... especially given his judge-friendly, clean-punching style and the overwhelming crowd support he'll receive at T-Mobile Arena, which may also influence the judges.

With that said, I think there is a mismatch in effective power here that I think will be too much for Canelo to overcome. Canelo's chin has been solid at lower weights but Golovkin is by far the best power puncher Canelo has faced in his career, which I think will be more than enough to overcome Canelo's advantage in skill.

Canelo may be a better pure boxer than Golovkin, but so were Golovkin's last two opponents (Jacobs and Kell Brook last September). Like Canelo, Brook was a pound-for-pound ranked, big fighter for his weight division with elite skills who moved up in weight to challenge for Golovkin's middleweight titles. Brook - who I believe is a better boxer than Canelo - arguably outboxed Golovkin in the early rounds but got overwhelmed by Golovkin's power, forcing his corner to stop the fight in the 5th round.

As mentioned previously Golovkin struggled for portions of his fight vs. Jacobs but Jacobs, in my opinion, is a very underrated boxer who had the size, foot speed, and power as a true middleweight
to give Golovkin problems. Jacobs was also able to confuse Golovkin by giving him different looks (i.e., switching from orthodox to southpaw stance and vice-versa) at times during the fight. Unlike Jacobs, Canelo doesn't have the speed to elude Golovkin's pressure for twelve rounds and I doubt he has the power at middleweight (that he had at light middleweight and welterweight) to pose a real threat to a fighter in Golovkin who is arguably the best middleweight of this generation.

I also expect Canelo's noted issues with stamina to be a severe detriment vs. a stalking, pressure fighter like Golovkin; Canelo won't have the opportunities tonight that he's had in lower weight classes or vs. less-skilled opponents to conserve energy by taking breaks during rounds. Canelo's recent gain in muscle mass may also negatively affect his stamina, not to mention lessen the solid hand speed he's displayed at lower weights.

Given the power discrepancy in this matchup, along with Canelo's flat-footed boxing style and questionable stamina, I think the most likely outcome of this fight is Golovkin by TKO/KO. If Canelo can't escape Golovkin's range and is unable to withstand his power, he doesn't stand much of a chance over the course of twelve rounds. However, the value (at -150) is so solid on Golovkin simply to win the fight (I'd personally grade this matchup at minimum -400 in favor of Golovkin) that I recommend placing the majority of the bet on this fight on Golovkin to win, with a smaller amount on the most likely specific outcome of Golovkin by TKO/KO/DQ (which can currently be found as high as +160).

Canelo has been the beneficiary of generous scoring in his previous fights that have lasted twelve rounds, but note that these were generally fights where he was mostly the aggressor (most notably his controversial wins vs. Lara, Trout, and his loss to Mayweather where one judge scored the fight a draw). I see Golovkin's power largely dominating this fight and can't see Canelo being the aggressor for much of this fight even if he lasts the full twelve rounds.

I see Golovkin's power vs. Canelo's largely flat-footed style possibly being a bigger mismatch than what people are expecting (to the extent that this *could* end up being a very easy fight for Golovkin). But, in terms of high-profile, elite talent still at the peaks of their career, this is one of the better matchups we've seen in a long, long time so let's hope the fight lives up to the hype!


Prediction: Golovkin by TKO/KO


Recommended bets: 
1) Golovkin to win (2 units) 
2) Golovkin by TKO/KO/DQ (.5 unit)


  for additional boxing analysis and to be notified of new blog updates!!!

Friday, August 25, 2017

Mayweather vs. McGregor: prefight analysis and betting prediction



Fight: Floyd Mayweather (49-0 26 KOs) vs. Conor McGregor (0-0, 0 KOs)
Location: T-Mobile Arena, Las Vegas, Nevada
Date: August 26, 2017
Weight class: Super Middleweight (154 lbs)
Title(s) on the line: None
TV: Showtime PPV
Line: Mayweather: -580, McGregor: +490 (5 Dimes, 8/25/17)
Ring Magazine Rankings: Mayweather: Not ranked (first fight in 23.5 months), McGregor: Not ranked (first professional fight as a boxer)
Purse: Mayweather: $100 million, McGregor: $30 million (guaranteed money only - both fighters stand to make substantially more based on their share of PPV revenues, ticket sales, etc.)
Style: Mayweather: Orthodox, McGregor: Southpaw
Referee: Robert Byrd


Why you should watch this fight


Mayweather vs. McGregor is considered by many to be the biggest event in the history of modern combat sports (a history that spans 150+ years). The event is widely projected to set the record for highest grossing event in the history of boxing (exceeding the record $410 million in gross revenues earned by Mayweather vs. Pacquiao in 2015) as well as the record for most pay-per-view (PPV) buys in boxing (exceeding Mayweather vs. Pacquiao's record 4.6 million PPV buys).

This once-in-a-lifetime mega fight features Floyd Mayweather Jr. - considered by most to be the greatest boxer of this generation and considered by some to be the greatest boxer ever - vs. Conor McGregor, by far the biggest name in MMA and arguably the best fighter in the MMA today pound-for-pound (though is currently ranked by most #3 pound-for-pound behind Jon Jones and Demetrious Johnson).

Mayweather is an undefeated (49-0), all-time-great, five-division world champion boxer with nearly 21 years of professional boxing experience who has beaten a record 24 current or former world champions in what will be a first ballot hall-of-fame career. Tomorrow, he will be fighting an MMA fighter in McGregor who has never boxed professionally (0-0 record) and had an unremarkable amateur boxing career. Despite the obvious disparity on paper, there is still enormous intrigue here given that Mayweather and McGregor are by far the two biggest names in combat sports. Also, Mayweather is 40 years old, hasn't fought in nearly two years, and isn't the boxer he was in his prime while McGregor is over a decade younger (29 years old), in the prime of his career, and has a reputation for having very good to great boxing skills for an MMA fighter.

There seems to be a genuine belief amongst many (perhaps aided by McGregor's immense popularity and the desire by many - boxing and MMA fans alike - to see Mayweather lose his first fight) that McGregor has very realistic shot to win this fight, which is reflected in the fact that the overwhelming majority of bets on this fight (reported as high as 95% of bets at the MGM sportsbook) are being placed on McGregor to win. Mayweather - who opened at some sportsbooks as more than a 20-1 (-2000) favorite - is currently only an approximately 6-1 (-600) favorite at most sportsbooks.

Will Mayweather reach 50-0 and surpass a record he currently shares with Rocky Marciano (49-0) for most career wins without a loss or tie by a current or former world champion upon retirement? Or will McGregor be able to take advantage of his size advantage at 154 lbs (a weight Mayweather has only fought at twice before in his career) to pull off what would be considered the greatest upset in sports history and put a permanent black mark on a sport in boxing that has struggled in recent years to retain its status as a mainstream sport?



Why Floyd Mayweather will win


At least on paper, Mayweather vs. McGregor may literally be the biggest mismatch in the history of top-level professional sports. Mayweather has never lost a fight (moreover has rarely even come close to losing a fight) and is one of the greatest boxers - arguably the single greatest defensive boxer - in the 150+ year history of modern boxing. Per (relatively objective) punch stat tracking, Mayweather is by far the most accurate, efficient, overall dominant fighter in the history of the sport for CompuBox-tracked fights. Mayweather is a former five-weight division world champion with over 21 years of professional experience facing an opponent in McGregor who has never boxed professionally (and has had limited amateur experience vs. non world-class opponents). Mayweather - considered one of the more intelligent, crafty fighters in the history of the sport - comes into this fight with what should be an overwhelming advantage in pure boxing experience, skill, and IQ.

Mayweather is 40 years old (over 11 years older than McGregor) but - due to his risk-averse, defensive style - has taken minimal physical damage over the course of his career and will come into this fight with a very clear hand and foot speed advantage over McGregor despite not being quite as agile or having quite the reflexes he had in his prime. Even at his age, one would expect that Mayweather has retained enough of his typically excellent timing, speed, and accuracy to land his patented left hook and straight right at will vs. a fighter in McGregor who has not only never boxed professionally before, but has never been known for his defensive prowess - even in the octagon.

Indeed, Mayweather almost certainly isn't the pound-for-pound level fighter he was in his prime but as recently as two years ago - in his late 30s - Mayweather was ranked #1 pound-for-pound in the world and decisively beat then-world champion (and future hall-of-famer) Manny Pacquiao to unify the welterweight titles. Four months later, Mayweather won all 12 rounds vs. a younger, former world champion in Andre Berto in what was his last fight before tomorrow's matchup with McGregor. Both Pacquiao and Berto would be decisively favored to beat McGregor if they fought him today.

Eight years ago after a similar long layoff from boxing (21 months) a 32-year old, past-prime Mayweather returned to the ring to dominate future first ballot hall-of-famer Juan Manuel Marquez, who at the time was ranked the #2 pound-for-pound fighter in the world (behind only Manny Pacquiao) by Ring Magazine. In tomorrow's fight he returns to fight an MMA fighter with no professional boxing experience.

Even stylistically, this is a very tough matchup for McGregor. In the UFC octagon McGregor is known as a counterpuncher - he does not have experience employing the aggressive, come-forward, high punch output style that has at times given Mayweather difficulty in previous fights (see his first fights vs. Jose Luis Castillo and Marcos Maidana). Employing a highly aggressive, brawling style would likely give McGregor his best chance to win the fight but using a style he's essentially never employed before (neither in the octagon nor the ring) is extremely risky vs. a highly experienced, skilled boxer like Mayweather. On the other hand, if McGregor sticks to his traditional counterpunching style, he'd essentially have to out counterpunch/outbox one of the greatest counterpunchers in the history of the sport. And do that in the first professional boxing match of his career.

The fact that Mayweather, a known control freak who - as the "A" side of all his recent fights - typically tailors even the minute details of his fights (e.g., size of the boxing ring, type of gloves, etc.) to his advantage, was willing to allow 8 oz. gloves (instead of the standard minimum 10 oz. gloves for weight divisions above 154 lbs) reveals how confident he is coming into this fight. Smaller gloves increase the impact of power punches - which in theory should be beneficial for a power puncher like McGregor who's had an impressive 18 of his 21 career MMA wins come by knockout - but the smaller gloves may be much more likelier to benefit the quicker, much more savvy Mayweather assuming he (as is expected in this matchup ) lands the cleaner punches at a much higher percentage.

McGregor is a southpaw known for his immense punching power and ability to throw effective punches from unpredictable angles. But Mayweather has experience fighting much more experienced and skilled boxers (i.e., former world champions) with many of those same traits (see his fights vs. Pacquiao, Maidana, and Zab Judah) and beaten those fighters decisively.

All indications are that McGregor has trained hard for this fight but he is known for having stamina issues in five-round MMA fights. It's difficult to imagine - no matter how hard he's trained over the past couple of months to improve endurance - that he won't experience stamina issues over the course of a 12-round fight (which I'll remind the reader yet again is his first ever professional boxing match) trying to chase down one of the most elusive boxers in the history of sport in terms of both foot and vertical body movement. I'd anticipate McGregor's legs and any meaningful KO punching power will significantly deteriorate by the middle rounds of the fight (if the fight even lasts that long) given Mayweather's skill at forcing his opponents to expend unnecessary energy chasing him around the ring.

Solid boxers who have sparred with McGregor (former minor world title holder Chris van Heerden last year and former two-division world champion Paulie Malignaggi a few weeks ago) were both unimpressed with McGregor's boxing skills and claim to have easily gotten the better of McGregor in sparring despite being relatively unprepared and relatively out of shape for the sparring sessions. Both fighters - neither of whom today would be considered on the level of a 40-year old Mayweather - would be strongly favored over McGregor if  they were fighting him this week. Most professional boxers - whether top-level or journeyman - would be favored to beat a fighter in McGregor who - as naturally talented as he is - has never boxed professionally before. A McGregor win over Mayweather this weekend would likely be the greatest upset in the history of professional sports (at least in terms of historical significance, if not pure magnitude).


Why Conor McGregor will win


McGregor has never boxed professionally but he actually does come into this fight with several advantages.

He is (by far) the younger fighter in this matchup and is in his prime facing a 40-year old fighter in Mayweather who hasn't fought professionally in nearly two years. As perhaps the greatest defensive fighter in the history of the sport Mayweather has taken minimal punishment in his career, but it's impossible to predict how much Mayweather's skills have declined given his age and the fact that he is coming off the longest layoff of his career. While still effective enough to decisively outpoint top-level opponents, Mayweather's speed, reflexes, power, etc. have noticeably deteriorated in recent fights. One can reasonably assume the skills of a 40-year old man who's spent nearly two years out of the ring have deteriorated even further - the big question in tomorrow's fight is... to what extent?

McGregor has never boxed professionally but is known to have excellent boxing skills for an MMA fighter. He's an aggressive counterpuncher with very good punching power (having had 18 of his 21 career victories coming by TKO/KO) and a seemingly granite chin. While not as fast as Mayweather, McGregor also moves well on his feet and possesses deceptive hand speed. McGregor is a southpaw who is adept at throwing power punches from awkward angles that can be difficult for opponents to time effectively.

McGregor has three losses in his MMA career but all three losses were the result of MMA submissions. McGregor has never been stopped from a boxing stance and has generally been dominant vs. MMA opponents from that position.

Though known as a counterpuncher in the octagon it is not known (given that he's never boxed professionally) what style he'll employ in Saturday's fight vs. Mayweather - i.e., whether he attempts to use his counterpunching abilities and range to outbox Mayweather in spots and possibly land big punches from distance or turn the fight into a physical brawl and outwork Mayweather from inside (a style he could be surprisingly effective at given his extensive grappling experience from MMA). McGregor's size advantage, notable punching power, awkward offensive attack, and the fact that it will be very difficult for Mayweather to effectively prepare for McGregor's style (given that this is McGregor's first pro boxing match - thus doesn't have an established boxing style) underscores the legitimate "puncher's chance" he has vs. an aging, slowing Mayweather who has had problems in previous fights vs. unpredictable fighters who throw power punches effectively from awkward angles (e.g., multiple stretches of his fights with Pacquiao and Maidana).

McGregor is the naturally bigger fighter (having fought as high as 170 lbs in MMA competition, most notably in his majority decision victory vs. Nate Diaz) with a slight height and 2" reach advantage. Throughout his career, Mayweather has noticeably avoided similarly built fighters (i.e., taller, rangier, maybe a bit bigger - see Paul Williams, Antonio Margarito, and Amir Khan who each called him out repeatedly to no avail) who possess effective punching ability. Fighters with these traits pose arguably the most dangerous threat to his defensively-oriented, relatively low-output style where he is usually able to exploit a reach advantage to control fights with a long jab and elusive movement. Depending on how far Mayweather's skills have deteriorated, there is a chance McGregor could control certain spots in the fight getting physical with Mayweather, using his size advantage and high punch output to outwork Floyd (as Joe Horn effectively did last month in his massive upset of Pacquiao).

Last week, the Nevada State Athletic Commission unanimously approved use of 8 oz. gloves for Saturday's fight - a one-time exception from the long-standing requirement that 10 oz. gloves be used for fights contested above 147 lbs. The smaller gloves (and resultant smaller padding surrounding the core of the gloves) naturally increases  the likelihood that McGregor - a very good power puncher (at least by MMA standards) who will likely come into this fight weighing 10-15 lbs more than Mayweather - can land that one big punch (or series of big punches) necessary for a TKO/KO victory. (Though it should be noted that the smaller glove size increases Mayweather's chances of winning by TKO/KO as well.)

Despite this fight taking place in Las Vegas, the city where Mayweather has lived and trained for over 20 years and fought his last 14 fights, the crowd at the T-Mobile Arena (which will include many of the thousands of fans who have already flown over from Ireland to watch the fight) is expected to overwhelmingly favor McGregor - which could provide a confidence boost for the Irish fighter inside the ring and perhaps influence the judges' scoring outside the ring if there happen to be close rounds.

But even without the enthusiastic crowd support he's expected to receive, McGregor is is a highly confident fighter who genuinely believes he will win this fight. Less than five years ago, McGregor made his UFC debut as an unheralded prospect; within a couple of years he became a UFC world champion and the biggest name in mixed martial arts. McGregor has defied odds in the past - if he can catch momentum early in the fight and Mayweather's skills have deteriorated more than expected, it's within reason that his confidence and fighting spirit could keep him competitive and give him a chance to pull off a massive upset.


Prefight Analysis


Yes- McGregor does have a puncher's chance to win this fight. He's the (much) younger fighter in this matchup, facing a 40-year old fighter in Mayweather who - while certainly one of the all-time greats - hasn't fought in nearly two years and showed signs of slippage in his fights prior to his layoff. There's a popular saying about Father Time being undefeated and the fact is no one really knows to what extent Mayweather's skills have deteriorated in his time away from the ring.

McGregor is the naturally bigger fighter - having fought regularly in the UFC at 155 lbs and at weights as high as 170 lbs - and is expected to come into tomorrow's fight with at least a 10-15 lb weight advantage over Mayweather, who has only fought at 154 lbs twice in his career (in wins vs. Oscar De La Hoya and Miguel Cotto). In terms of physical traits (i.e., taller fighter with good reach and punching power), McGregor is exactly the type of fighter Mayweather avoided even in the prime of his career and - unlike essentially every other opponent in Floyd's career - will be nearly impossible to prepare well for given that he's never boxed professionally.

McGregor's unpredictable tactics and MMA-proven ability to throw highly effective power punches
(particularly with his left hand) from awkward angles is a key advantage. If McGregor can land even one solid shot vs. the 40-year old former champion, you never know how that could turn the fight. Given the higher weight class (than what Mayweather is accustomed to) and McGregor's seemingly solid chin (plus the fact that McGregor really has nothing to lose given that this is his first professional boxing match and is not expected to win this fight), I expect McGregor to take some big risks and land at least a few clean punches in exchanging with Mayweather... the question is how clean will those punches land and to what extent will those punches affect Mayweather? McGregor has enough physical advantages in this fight as to where he does have a legitimate "puncher's chance" to win this fight.

But a "puncher's chance" is very literally the only chance McGregor has to win this fight. My assessment of fight is that it is one of the most lopsided matchups (and mispriced bets) in the history of mainstream professional sports. (The mispricing here is due in large part to the number of MMA and casual sports fans looking for a big return on investment by betting on McGregor.) The reality of this fight is you have one of the all-time boxing greats in Mayweather - statistically perhaps the most dominant boxer ever who has taken minimal punishment in his career and, while not the boxer he was in his prime, is still likely capable of winning major world titles in the sport -  vs. a fighter in McGregor who has never boxed before (and has limited experience even at the amateur level).

This fight is a "mismatch" in the purest sense of the word and, with Floyd as only a 6-1 favorite, is grossly mispriced. (I'd honestly grade McGregor as somewhere between a 33-1 and 99-1 underdog consistent with the 1-3% chance I give him of winning this fight.) It's beyond absurd, for example, that McGregor - as an approximately 5-1 underdog - is a smaller underdog vs. an undefeated Mayweather than former world champions in boxing like Berto (as high as 50-1), Maidana (as high as 14-1), and Robert Guerrero (as high as 9-1) - all of whom were talented, highly-skilled, world-class boxers who spent the majority of their lives honing their boxing craft to earn their shot vs. Mayweather.

Despite being 40 years old and the smaller guy, Mayweather comes into this fight with a virtually infinite advantage in boxing experience (given that he is facing a fighter with zero professional boxing experience) and is expected to have a clear advantage in speed, quickness, and skill. Conor has experience boxing under MMA rules, but MMA is an entirely different sport with different rules (and thus a different strategy construct).

There is a reason even the most talented and skilled boxers are brought up slowly in the first phase of their professional careers; lack of experience can result in even gifted boxers taking a loss vs. less skilled (but more experienced) talent (see pound-for-pound ranked Vasyl Lomachenko's loss to Orlando Salido in 2014 as a recent example). McGregor is a very good boxer by MMA standards but does not come close to approaching the talent of Lomachenko (or likely even the talent of the journeymen Mayweather fought in the early and middle stages of his career for that matter); while not clearly quantifiable, the experience gap is - in my opinion - by far the biggest advantage Mayweather has in this fight, never mind his historically great talents and skill.

I believe, far and away, that the most likely outcome of this fight is Mayweather by TKO/KO (and quite frankly would be very surprised and consider it a massive disappointment for Mayweather if he doesn't stop McGregor). Once Mayweather develops a read and gets comfortable with McGregor's style he should be able to land at will on McGregor, given the Irish fighter's overall raw inexperience and inexperience with basic defensive boxing fundamentals. I think Mayweather by TKO/KO at any price up to -200 is likely the best value bet for this matchup (though this bet can currently be found as low as -150).

But given Mayweather's age, brittle hands, and risk-averse boxing style I'm more inclined to take the virtually "sure" outcome and place the majority of my bet on simply Mayweather to win (which currently can be found as low as -500). Again, the current value on Mayweather might be the best value (outside of accidental mispricing) I've ever seen in my entire time betting on sports; bankroll management and the possibility of McGregor landing a lucky punch or a 40-year old Mayweather suffering a freak injury during the fight are literally the only reasons why I wouldn't risk at least 90% of my bankroll on Mayweather to win. As it is, I am content risking over 15% of my bankroll betting on Mayweather to win (and a smaller amount on the most likely specific outcome of Mayweather by TKO/KO).

Should be an entertaining event, though not necessarily an entertaining fight!


Prediction: Mayweather by TKO/KO/DQ


Recommended bets: 
1) Mayweather to win (3 units) 
2) Mayweather by TKO/KO/DQ (.5 unit)



  for additional boxing analysis and to be notified of new blog updates!!!

Saturday, July 29, 2017

Broner vs. Garcia: prefight analysis and betting prediction



Fight: Adrien Broner (33-2-0 24 KOs) vs. Mikey Garcia (36-0-0, 30 KOs)
Location: Barclays Center, Brooklyn, New York, New York
Date: July 29, 2017
Weight class: Super Lightweight (140 lbs)
Title(s) on the line: None
TV: Showtime
Line: Garcia: -200, Broner: +185 (5 Dimes, 7/29/17)
Purse: Garcia: $1 million, Broner: $1 million
Ring Magazine Rankings: Garcia: #1 ranked lightweight, Broner: Not ranked (neither fighter is ranked at super lightweight)
Style: Garcia: Orthodox, Broner: Orthodox


Why you should watch this fight


Of all the big fights this year between high-profile boxers this could very easily end up being the most entertaining of them all. You have an undefeated, three-division world champion in Mikey Garcia moving up in weight to fight at a full 140 lbs for the first time in his career vs. a former four-division world champion in Adrien Broner, who comes into this fight as a significant underdog but is undefeated fighting below 147 lbs. Shortly after this fight was announced, Garcia was as high as a -720 (!) favorite over Broner but the odds have tightened considerably over the past few weeks to where Garcia is now only a little bit more than a -200 favorite at most sportsbooks.

As the undefeated - arguably more skilled - and more serious and composed fighter, Garcia understandably comes into this fight as the clear favorite. But Broner, despite his previous struggles vs. top-level contenders and immaturity in as well as outside of the ring, is a high IQ boxer in his own right with A-level talent and very good punching power at 140 lbs. There is also a potential size disparity here - Garcia's last fight was at lightweight (135 lbs) and he'll be moving up to 140 lbs to fight at a weight he's never fought at before while Broner's last  fight was at welterweight (147 lbs) and he'll be moving down to fight at a weight where he'll likely be more comfortable and have more effective punching power vs. his smaller opponent.

This fight is a clash between two of the more well-known non-PPV fighters in the sport. The fight is the biggest fight in both boxers' careers and is especially intriguing given both the clash in personalities (serious, laid-back, quiet Garcia vs. the often silly, brash, loquacious Broner) and clash in fighting styles (cautiously aggressive power puncher in Garcia vs. relatively low-output counter puncher in Broner). If Garcia wins on Saturday, he'll cement his return (after having fought just twice in the past 3.5 years due to a contract dispute with his previous promoter, Top Rank) as one of the top pound-for-pound fighters in the sport and should set him up nicely for a big money fight - whether that's a title shot at 140 lbs or at title defense back down at 135 lbs, where he is the current WBC champion.

If Broner wins it would be the signature win of his career and go a (very) long way to proving to his numerous skeptics that he's now serious about living up to his enormous potential. As one of only 16 fighters in the history of boxing to have won major titles in 4 different weight classes, if Broner can pull off the upset here vs. Garcia, the boxing community will have to start at least thinking - as crazy as it may sound to some - about whether this guy deserves a spot in the International Boxing Hall of Fame someday.


Why Mikey Garcia will win


Garcia is an undefeated (36-0) boxer who has won major world titles in three division, including the lightweight division where he is the current WBC champion. Garcia won that lightweight championship this past January via 3rd round KO, in what was his first career fight in the lightweight division and only his second fight after a 2.5 year layoff from the sport due to a contractual dispute with then promoter Top Rank.

Garcia is a very good to great boxing technician with excellent punching power, as evidenced by his career 83.3% career KO ratio which ranks among the best of any active boxer regardless of weight class. Pound-for-pound, Garcia is indeed one of the hardest punchers in the sport, but he's also an extremely patient fighter who boxes with caution and tends to wait for opportunities to counter from mid- and long-range distance rather than brawl inside. Garcia will almost certainly not be as aggressive or physical as Marcos Maidana or Shawn Porter were in their victories vs. Broner (which are the only two losses of Broner's career) but his punch output is higher than the relatively low-volume Broner and his notable punching power should be effective enough even at the higher weight class, especially against a somewhat flat-footed Broner. Garcia scored two knockdowns in his only other career appearance in the super lightweight division, a 5th round TKO victory vs. Elio Rojas last July. (The TKO loss to Garcia was the first time Rojas had been stopped in his career.)  

Garcia is also known as a high IQ boxer who makes up for lack of elite athleticism with excellent fundamentals and footwork. His balance and leverage behind which he throws his power punches is somewhat resemblant of the fighter widely considered to be the top knockout artist in the sport, Gennady Golovkin. While he likely won't be as effective as Maidana or Porter were at smothering Broner with hyper-aggression, he has much better timing and accuracy than either of those boxers (or any boxer Broner has faced previously in his career for that matter),  and his patient, cautious style will leave him much less susceptible to Broner's counter punching than Maidana or Porter were. (Despite losing to both, Broner landed his share of clean shots vs. Porter and Maidana; Porter was knocked down in the 12th round in his victory over Broner and Maidana has commented multiple times on Broner being the hardest puncher he's ever faced.)

Unlike Broner, who is a jokester by nature and has developed a reputation for not taking the sport as seriously as he perhaps should, Garcia has always been a very serious, mature fighter who seemingly always comes into his fights very focused and prepared. Garcia knows that this is the biggest fight of his career and a win over Broner - one of the most well-known boxers in the sport - will lead to significant paydays in future fights as it did for both Maidana and Porter, who each have earned seven-figure paydays in all of their fights since defeating Broner. (Maidana earned over $3 million in each of his fights vs. Floyd Mayweather before retiring and, after beating Broner, Porter earned at least $1 million in his fights vs. both Keith Thurman and Andre Berto.)

Garcia is a fighter many consider to be one of the best in the sport pound-for-pound and is facing an opponent in Broner who has lost decisively (by wide unanimous decision) every time he's stepped up to face a top-level opponent. Broner's most high profile win was perhaps a controversial split-decision victory vs. Paulie Malignaggi, who was 32-years old at the time and a bit past his prime. Broner typically performs below expectation in his fights; the last fight in which Broner clearly met or exceeded performance expectations was perhaps his 8th round TKO victory way back in 2012 vs. Antonio DeMarco, who was a very solid contender at the time.

Garcia is likely much more familiar with Broner's fighting style and tendencies than Broner is of his. Garcia is trained by his older brother, widely respected trainer Robert Garcia, who was Maidana's trainer when Maidana decisively beat Broner in Broner's first career loss back in 2013 (a fight where Broner suffered the only two knockdowns of his career). Garcia's familiarity and previous success training against Broner should allow him to better prepare for this fight compared to Broner's training team, who have relatively little recent film on Garcia to draw from given that Garcia has only fought twice and in a total of eight rounds in the past 3.5 years (due largely to his 2.5 years of inactivity).


Why Adrien Broner will win


Broner is a former four-division world champion who, when he was just 26 years old, became the youngest fighter in boxing history to win major world titles in four different weight classes. Although he often hasn't fought up to his potential thus far in his career (which makes having won world titles in four different weight classes all the more impressive), Broner is a top-level talent who less than 3.5 years ago was ranked #5 pound-for-pound in the world by Ring Magazine and considered by some the heir apparent to Floyd Mayweather before his surprising loss to Maidana, who came into the fight as high as a 5-1 (+500) underdog.

Broner is a 27-year old fighter still very much in the prime of his career and will come into Saturday's fight holding advantages in size, physical strength, and athleticism over Gracia. Broner also has quicker hands and - despite Garcia's proven punching power - Broner may actually have slightly better power than Garcia at 140 lbs. Broner's size and strength in particular may be a major factor in this fight - despite the two losses (and getting knocked down twice in the process), Broner was able to hold his own and showed a good chin at a higher weight class (147 lbs) vs. two well-respected punchers in Maidana and Porter; it wouldn't be surprising at all to see Broner have better success managing Garcia's power at this lower weight. Garcia, on the other hand, has been knocked down once before - in 2013 at a much lower weight class (130 lbs) and by a fighter in Rocky Martinez not known for his punching power. Garcia's chin has been relatively untested in the lower weight classes he's fought in - Broner will be (perhaps by far) the biggest, toughest power puncher he's faced thus far in his career.

This is Garcia's first fight at a full 140 lbs, a weight Broner has fought at or higher than in the majority of his fights over the past four years and won a world title in less than two years ago. Broner has the two losses in his career, but he's undefeated (29-0) fighting below 147 lbs and will be fighting a smaller, weaker guy in Garcia. Broner's two losses at welterweight were largely due to Maidana and Porter being able to use their physicality and awkward, hyper-aggressive fighting styles to overwhelm Broner; a smaller, less aggressive Garcia likely won't be able to do the same Saturday night.

Garcia is known to be a high IQ, very skilled fighter but Broner is a slick, skilled technician in his own right; Broner is a relatively accurate, efficient puncher with power in both hands (as evidenced by his respectable 67% TKO/KO percentage), as well as an effective jab and solid one-two combination punching (though the knock on Broner is he's often not been able to put together more than two-punch combination punches vs. tougher opponents).

Broner also has an advantage in experience over Garcia, having fought numerous former world champions including Porter, Maidana, Malignaggi, Daniel Ponce De Leon, De Marco, and Gavin Rees, among others. Garcia is relatively untested in comparison, with perhaps the best wins of his career coming in 2013 vs. Juan Manuel Lopez - who's lost his last four title fights by TKO/KO due to a weak chin - and vs. 13-loss former world champion Orlando Salido. It also seems to be getting overlooked that Garcia has fought only twice in the past 3.5 years. Given Garcia's relatively weak level of competition and recent inactivity over the past few years it's highly possible Garcia is being overrated in this matchup.

Despite being a bit flat-footed, Broner has better defense than most give him credit for. Broner is adept with both the shoulder roll and high guard defense. With his quick reflexes, he slips and rolls punches fairly well from inside and is generally a difficult boxer to hit cleanly. If Garcia's punching power doesn't carry up to 140 lbs as well as most expect it will there's a good chance Broner's defense will easily be able to withstand Garcia's attack. If Broner was able to last 12 rounds at welterweight with an over 80% TKO/KO percentage fighter in Maidana, and was able to withstand the attack of Porter - a big welterweight who has had a lot of pro experience fighting at middleweight (160 lbs) - it stands to reason that Broner won't have too much difficulty with a less imposing, relatively patient puncher in Garcia who's coming up from a smaller weight class.

Broner has shown signs of taking this fight more seriously than previous high-profile fights where he's put forth disappointing performances. He's moved his training camp from his usual locations in Cincinnati, Ohio and Washington, D.C. to Colorado Springs, Colorado where he trained earlier in his career - presumably to minimize outside distractions. Broner has failed to make weight for multiple fights in the past and/or has negotiated a change in weight limit at the last minute so he could make weight but appears to have made the 140 lb weight for this fight without difficulty. Broner is a high profile, polarizing character who sells tickets often on his personality alone but he's well aware that Saturday's fight vs. Garcia may be his last opportunity to create a path to the Mayweather-level PPV superstardom he desires. Broner appears to be relishing the underdog status he has in this fight and sees this fight as an opportunity to prove a lot of his doubters wrong.


Prefight Analysis


In many ways this is a favorable matchup for Broner - he is the superior fighter in terms of size, physical strength, quickness, and athleticism. Broner also has more experience vs. top-level opponents and, at 140 lbs, arguably even packs more power behind his punch than the heavy-handed Garcia. Garcia may be the more skilled, fundamentally sound fighter but his skill and power will be mitigated by the fact that he's moving up in weight to fight at a full 140 lbs for the first time vs. a slick, defensively solid fighter in Broner who is comfortable at 140 lbs and even won a world title in the weight class less than two years ago. Broner is the biggest, most skilled, and most effective puncher Garcia has fought in his career. He's certainly a live underdog; if the +500 odds (for Broner to win) this fight opened at back in June were available today, I would take happily those odds and bet Broner without thinking too much about it.

With that said, I like Garcia to win this fight (at -200 odds) for a few reasons. Firstly, Garcia has always been a big boxer for the smaller weights he's fought at, to the extent of having had trouble making weight in a few fights and even losing his WBO featherweight title on the scales in his 2013 TKO victory vs. Juan Manuel Lopez after failing to make weight. 140 lbs is closer to Garcia's normal walk-around weight of 150-155 lbs; I see Garcia adjusting just fine to a weight closer to his normal weight and think his power will carry up to the higher weight accordingly. While Broner is resilient and has shown a decent chin vs. bigger opponents, I expect Garcia's power to be effective enough to cause problems for Broner, especially when you combine the leverage with which he throws his punches with his excellent timing and accuracy.

Again, Broner is the bigger, stronger fighter in this matchup but a big key here is that stylistically, Broner's a relatively low-volume, 1-2 punch combination counter puncher. I anticipate Broner's style and reluctance in many spots to be the aggressor to mostly mitigate the physical advantages he has over Garcia. Broner is at times flat-footed and often tentative in his attack, which I think will allow Garcia to press his attack more in the middle and later rounds after he develops a read on Broner's tendencies; I see Garcia having more success landing his jab and power right hand in particular as the fight progresses and he adjusts to Broner's style.

Broner is saying the Garcia fight will be the fight where he turns things around and shows why he should be considered one of the top pound-for-pound fighters in the sport but he's actually said the same thing prior to most of his recent fights. The fact is, Broner hasn't performed up to expectations (i.e., the expectations of the A-level fighter that he was rated as earlier in his career) in *any* of his fights in recent years and has even struggled to win rounds vs. B-level fighters like Adrian Granados and Ashley Theophane (his two most recent opponents).

Garcia is perhaps the best fighter Broner has fought thus far in his career (a career in which he's already suffered two decisive losses, as well as being awarded multiple decisions that were deemed controversial and I think it will show Saturday night in what will be at times a highly competitive and entertaining, but clear victory for Garcia by decision or late stoppage. Broner certainly has the size, power, and skill to beat (or even stop) Garcia but given his fight style, I don't see him using his physicality or throwing enough punches to outpoint a patient - but more active - fighter in Garcia over the course of 12 rounds.


Prediction: Garcia to win

Recommended bet: Garcia to win (1 unit)


  for additional boxing analysis and to be notified of new blog updates!!!